Iceland vs Jamaica: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Iceland
-903,019
in 2025
Jamaica
-38,679
in 2025
Iceland rank
35th
Jamaica rank
32nd

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Iceland
  • Jamaica
-150.0M-100.0M-50.0M0200620152025

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports -38,679 against -903,019 in Iceland, a difference of 864,340.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Jamaica ahead.

Iceland ranks 35th and Jamaica ranks 32nd of 60 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Jamaica Difference Ahead
2010s -32.22 million -13.05 million 19.16 million Jamaica
2020s -17.69 million -2.31 million 15.38 million Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Iceland or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at -38,679 against -903,019 in Iceland as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Iceland and Jamaica?
864,340, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Jamaica?
13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Jamaica rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Iceland ranks 35th and Jamaica ranks 32nd of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social S. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Jamaica: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent-2/iceland/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent-2/iceland/jamaica/">Iceland vs Jamaica: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social S
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,064 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.