Iceland vs Mauritius: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Iceland
-903,019
in 2025
Mauritius
-4.86 million
in 2025
Iceland rank
35th
Mauritius rank
38th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritius
-150.0M-100.0M-50.0M0200620152025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports -903,019 against -4.86 million in Mauritius, a difference of 3.95 million.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mauritius ahead.

Iceland ranks 35th and Mauritius ranks 38th of 60 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritius Difference Ahead
2010s -34.84 million -15.98 million 18.86 million Mauritius
2020s -17.69 million -16.46 million 1.23 million Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Iceland or Mauritius?
Iceland, at -903,019 against -4.86 million in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Iceland and Mauritius?
3.95 million, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritius?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Mauritius rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Iceland ranks 35th and Mauritius ranks 38th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social S. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritius: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent-2/iceland/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent-2/iceland/mauritius/">Iceland vs Mauritius: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social S
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,064 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.