India vs Jordan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

India
-824.00 million
in 2025
Jordan
-876.69 million
in 2025
India rank
55th
Jordan rank
57th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • India
  • Jordan
-1.2B-1.0B-800.0M-600.0M-400.0M200620152025

How they compare

India currently reports -824.00 million against -876.69 million in Jordan, a difference of 52.69 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was India ahead.

India ranks 55th and Jordan ranks 57th of 61 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s -364.67 million -1.05 billion 685.39 million India
2010s -627.80 million -1.06 billion 433.85 million India
2020s -895.50 million -812.03 million 83.47 million Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), India or Jordan?
India, at -824.00 million against -876.69 million in Jordan as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between India and Jordan?
52.69 million, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Jordan?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do India and Jordan rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
India ranks 55th and Jordan ranks 57th of 61 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities, More than 3 months and up to 1 year (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Jordan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent-3/india/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent-3/india/jordan/">India vs Jordan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities, More than 3 months and up to 1 year (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
63 places, 1,087 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.