Lithuania vs Russian Federation: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Lithuania
-108,870
in 2015
Russian Federation
-6.72 million
in 2009
Lithuania rank
31st
Russian Federation rank
33rd

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Lithuania
  • Russian Federation
-300.0M-200.0M-100.0M0200420092015

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -108,870 against -6.72 million in Russian Federation, a difference of 6.61 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 31st and Russian Federation ranks 33rd of 61 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Lithuania or Russian Federation?
Lithuania, at -108,870 against -6.72 million in Russian Federation as of 2015.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Lithuania and Russian Federation?
6.61 million, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Russian Federation?
5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2009.
How do Lithuania and Russian Federation rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Lithuania ranks 31st and Russian Federation ranks 33rd of 61 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities, More than 3 months and up to 1 year (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Russian Federation: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent-3/lithuania/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent-3/lithuania/russian-federation/">Lithuania vs Russian Federation: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities, More than 3 months and up to 1 year (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
63 places, 1,087 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.