Serbia vs Sri Lanka: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Serbia
-149.87 million
in 2025
Sri Lanka
-150.00 million
in 2021
Serbia rank
42nd
Sri Lanka rank
43rd

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Serbia
  • Sri Lanka
-160.0M-140.0M-120.0M-100.0M201520202025

How they compare

Serbia currently reports -149.87 million against -150.00 million in Sri Lanka, a difference of 132,000.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Serbia ranks 42nd and Sri Lanka ranks 43rd of 61 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s -147.85 million -124.77 million 23.08 million Sri Lanka
2020s -140.89 million -149.35 million 8.46 million Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Serbia or Sri Lanka?
Serbia, at -149.87 million against -150.00 million in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Serbia and Sri Lanka?
132,000, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sri Lanka?
5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
How do Serbia and Sri Lanka rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Serbia ranks 42nd and Sri Lanka ranks 43rd of 61 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities, More than 3 months and up to 1 year (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Sri Lanka: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent-3/serbia/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent-3/serbia/sri-lanka/">Serbia vs Sri Lanka: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities, More than 3 months and up to 1 year (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Soc
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
63 places, 1,087 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.