Denmark vs Sri Lanka: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Denmark
-270.66 million
in 2025
Sri Lanka
-278.44 million
in 2021
Denmark rank
32nd
Sri Lanka rank
34th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Denmark
  • Sri Lanka
-1.0B-500.0M0500.0M200020122025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports -270.66 million against -278.44 million in Sri Lanka, a difference of 7.79 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Denmark ranks 32nd and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 74 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s -472.26 million -232.03 million 240.22 million Sri Lanka
2020s -213.75 million -276.90 million 63.15 million Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Denmark or Sri Lanka?
Denmark, at -270.66 million against -278.44 million in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Denmark and Sri Lanka?
7.79 million, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Sri Lanka?
7 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2021.
How do Denmark and Sri Lanka rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Denmark ranks 32nd and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 74 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Sri Lanka: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/denmark/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/denmark/sri-lanka/">Denmark vs Sri Lanka: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
76 places, 1,352 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.