Egypt vs Japan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Egypt
-8.12 billion
in 2025
Japan
-13.64 billion
in 2025
Egypt rank
70th
Japan rank
73rd

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Egypt
  • Japan
-12.5B-10.0B-7.5B-5.0B-2.5B200020122025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports -8.12 billion against -13.64 billion in Japan, a difference of 5.52 billion.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Japan ahead.

Egypt ranks 70th and Japan ranks 73rd of 74 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Japan Difference Ahead
2000s -4.02 billion -2.62 billion 1.40 billion Japan
2010s -4.54 billion -5.90 billion 1.35 billion Egypt
2020s -6.51 billion -9.05 billion 2.54 billion Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Egypt or Japan?
Egypt, at -8.12 billion against -13.64 billion in Japan as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Egypt and Japan?
5.52 billion, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Japan?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Egypt and Japan rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Egypt ranks 70th and Japan ranks 73rd of 74 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Japan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/egypt-arab-rep/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/egypt-arab-rep/japan/">Egypt vs Japan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
76 places, 1,352 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.