Georgia vs Poland: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Georgia
-2.18 billion
in 2025
Poland
-3.63 billion
in 2025
Georgia rank
58th
Poland rank
61st

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Georgia
  • Poland
-6.0B-4.0B-2.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports -2.18 billion against -3.63 billion in Poland, a difference of 1.45 billion.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 58th and Poland ranks 61st of 74 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Poland Difference Ahead
2010s -799.29 million -544.93 million 254.36 million Poland
2020s -1.90 billion -2.36 billion 461.88 million Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Georgia or Poland?
Georgia, at -2.18 billion against -3.63 billion in Poland as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Georgia and Poland?
1.45 billion, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Poland?
16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Poland rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Georgia ranks 58th and Poland ranks 61st of 74 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Poland: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/georgia/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/georgia/poland/">Georgia vs Poland: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
76 places, 1,352 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.