Hungary vs Lithuania: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Hungary
-5.99 million
in 2025
Lithuania
-217,740
in 2015
Hungary rank
24th
Lithuania rank
23rd

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Hungary
  • Lithuania
-250.0M-200.0M-150.0M-100.0M-50.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -217,740 against -5.99 million in Hungary, a difference of 5.77 million.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 24th and Lithuania ranks 23rd of 74 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s -33.84 million -52.92 million 19.08 million Hungary
2010s -6.22 million -8.09 million 1.87 million Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Hungary or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at -217,740 against -5.99 million in Hungary as of 2015.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Hungary and Lithuania?
5.77 million, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Lithuania?
12 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2015.
How do Hungary and Lithuania rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Hungary ranks 24th and Lithuania ranks 23rd of 74 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Lithuania: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/hungary/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/hungary/lithuania/">Hungary vs Lithuania: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
76 places, 1,352 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.