India vs Jordan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

India
-992.00 million
in 2025
Jordan
-985.52 million
in 2025
India rank
43rd
Jordan rank
42nd

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • India
  • Jordan
-1.5B-1.2B-1.0B-750.0M-500.0M200620152025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports -985.52 million against -992.00 million in India, a difference of 6.47 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was India ahead.

India ranks 43rd and Jordan ranks 42nd of 74 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s -417.33 million -1.20 billion 786.39 million India
2010s -756.60 million -1.29 billion 534.87 million India
2020s -1.07 billion -934.01 million 137.49 million Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), India or Jordan?
Jordan, at -985.52 million against -992.00 million in India as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between India and Jordan?
6.47 million, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Jordan?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do India and Jordan rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
India ranks 43rd and Jordan ranks 42nd of 74 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Jordan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/india/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/india/jordan/">India vs Jordan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
76 places, 1,352 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.