Poland vs Serbia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Poland
-3.63 billion
in 2025
Serbia
-4.01 billion
in 2025
Poland rank
61st
Serbia rank
62nd

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Poland
  • Serbia
-6.0B-4.0B-2.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Poland currently reports -3.63 billion against -4.01 billion in Serbia, a difference of 383.27 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 62nd of 74 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s -543.52 million -2.26 billion 1.71 billion Poland
2020s -2.36 billion -3.43 billion 1.07 billion Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Poland or Serbia?
Poland, at -3.63 billion against -4.01 billion in Serbia as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Poland and Serbia?
383.27 million, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Serbia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Poland and Serbia rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Poland ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 62nd of 74 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Serbia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/poland/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-contingent/poland/serbia/">Poland vs Serbia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
76 places, 1,352 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.