Belarus vs Croatia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Belarus
-777.94 million
in 2025
Croatia
-543.69 million
in 2015
Belarus rank
36th
Croatia rank
33rd

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Belarus
  • Croatia
-3.0B-2.0B-1.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Croatia currently reports -543.69 million against -777.94 million in Belarus, a difference of 234.25 million.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 36th and Croatia ranks 33rd of 64 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Croatia Difference Ahead
2000s -18.55 million -2.07 billion 2.06 billion Belarus
2010s -296.02 million -772.37 million 476.35 million Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Belarus or Croatia?
Croatia, at -543.69 million against -777.94 million in Belarus as of 2015.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Belarus and Croatia?
234.25 million, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2015.
How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Belarus ranks 36th and Croatia ranks 33rd of 64 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Croatia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other/belarus/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other/belarus/croatia/">Belarus vs Croatia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
66 places, 1,113 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.