Euro Area (EA) vs Poland: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Euro Area (EA)
0
in 2025
Poland
0
in 2025
Euro Area (EA) rank
1st
Poland rank
1st

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Euro Area (EA)
  • Poland
-300.0M-200.0M-100.0M0199920122025

How they compare

Euro Area (EA) currently reports 0 against 0 in Poland, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Euro Area (EA) ahead.

Euro Area (EA) ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 1 groups.

Euro Area (EA) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro Area (EA) Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 0 -1.09 million 1.09 million Euro Area (EA)
2010s 0 -824,400 824,400 Euro Area (EA)
2020s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Euro Area (EA) or Poland?
Euro Area (EA), at 0 against 0 in Poland as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Euro Area (EA) and Poland?
0, with Euro Area (EA) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro Area (EA) and Poland?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Euro Area (EA) and Poland rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Euro Area (EA) ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 1 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro Area (EA) vs Poland: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other/euro-area-ea/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other/euro-area-ea/poland/">Euro Area (EA) vs Poland: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
66 places, 1,113 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.