Georgia vs Romania: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Georgia
-2.18 billion
in 2025
Romania
-4.05 billion
in 2025
Georgia rank
52nd
Romania rank
55th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Georgia
  • Romania
-20.0B-15.0B-10.0B-5.0B0200720162025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports -2.18 billion against -4.05 billion in Romania, a difference of 1.88 billion.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 52nd and Romania ranks 55th of 64 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 107.44 million -14.88 billion 14.99 billion Georgia
2010s -799.29 million -5.36 billion 4.56 billion Georgia
2020s -1.90 billion -3.25 billion 1.35 billion Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Georgia or Romania?
Georgia, at -2.18 billion against -4.05 billion in Romania as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Georgia and Romania?
1.88 billion, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Romania?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Romania rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Georgia ranks 52nd and Romania ranks 55th of 64 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Romania: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other/georgia/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other/georgia/romania/">Georgia vs Romania: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
66 places, 1,113 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.