Belarus vs Spain: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Belarus
-325.23 million
in 2025
Spain
-463.06 million
in 2011
Belarus rank
41st
Spain rank
44th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Belarus
  • Spain
-1.2B-1.0B-750.0M-500.0M-250.0M0200420142025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports -325.23 million against -463.06 million in Spain, a difference of 137.83 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 41st and Spain ranks 44th of 53 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Spain Difference Ahead
2000s -82.85 million -48.78 million 34.07 million Spain
2010s -642.10 million -236.72 million 405.38 million Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Belarus or Spain?
Belarus, at -325.23 million against -463.06 million in Spain as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Belarus and Spain?
137.83 million, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Spain?
6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
How do Belarus and Spain rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Belarus ranks 41st and Spain ranks 44th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total collateral guarantees on debt, Falling due within 1 year, Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Centr. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Spain: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-2/belarus/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-2/belarus/spain/">Belarus vs Spain: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total collateral guarantees on debt, Falling due within 1 year, Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Centr
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
54 places, 978 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.