Brazil vs Jamaica: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Brazil
-371.59 million
in 2025
Jamaica
-669.02 million
in 2025
Brazil rank
44th
Jamaica rank
45th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Brazil
  • Jamaica
-600.0M-400.0M-200.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports -371.59 million against -669.02 million in Jamaica, a difference of 297.43 million.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 44th and Jamaica ranks 45th of 67 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Jamaica Difference Ahead
2010s -177.70 million -358.78 million 181.08 million Brazil
2020s -327.80 million -580.81 million 253.00 million Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Brazil or Jamaica?
Brazil, at -371.59 million against -669.02 million in Jamaica as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Brazil and Jamaica?
297.43 million, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Jamaica?
13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Jamaica rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Brazil ranks 44th and Jamaica ranks 45th of 67 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Up to 1 month, Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Jamaica: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-up-to-1-month/brazil/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-up-to-1-month/brazil/jamaica/">Brazil vs Jamaica: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Up to 1 month, Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
69 places, 1,233 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.