Iceland vs Jordan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Iceland
-903,019
in 2025
Jordan
-1.48 million
in 2025
Iceland rank
24th
Jordan rank
25th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Iceland
  • Jordan
-80.0M-60.0M-40.0M-20.0M0200620152025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports -903,019 against -1.48 million in Jordan, a difference of 573,711.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 24th and Jordan ranks 25th of 67 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s -7.52 million -38.78 million 31.26 million Iceland
2010s -4.58 million -47.25 million 42.67 million Iceland
2020s -2.77 million -15.80 million 13.03 million Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Iceland or Jordan?
Iceland, at -903,019 against -1.48 million in Jordan as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Iceland and Jordan?
573,711, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Jordan?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Jordan rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Iceland ranks 24th and Jordan ranks 25th of 67 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Up to 1 month, Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Jordan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-up-to-1-month/iceland/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-up-to-1-month/iceland/jordan/">Iceland vs Jordan: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Up to 1 month, Contingent liabilities (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
69 places, 1,233 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.