Botswana vs Eswatini: Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio

Botswana
5.7%
in 2010
Eswatini
7.3%
in 2010
Botswana rank
34th
Eswatini rank
33rd

Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio over time

  • Botswana
  • Eswatini
02468200520072010

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 7.3% against 5.7% in Botswana, a difference of 1.6%.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Botswana's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 33rd of 36 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 5.5% 7.1% 1.6% Eswatini
2010s 5.7% 7.3% 1.6% Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt on concessional terms to export ratio, Botswana or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 7.3% against 5.7% in Botswana as of 2010.
What is the difference in debt on concessional terms to export ratio between Botswana and Eswatini?
1.6%, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Eswatini?
6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
How do Botswana and Eswatini rank globally for debt on concessional terms to export ratio?
Botswana ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 33rd of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio (% of exports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Eswatini: Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-on-concessional-terms-to-export-ratio-percent-of-exports/botswana/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-on-concessional-terms-to-export-ratio-percent-of-exports/botswana/eswatini/">Botswana vs Eswatini: Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio (% of exports)
Unit
% of exports
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
42 places, 283 data points, 2005–2011
Last refreshed

Concessional Long-term Debt Outstanding and Disbursed (LDOD) conveys information about the borrower's receipt of aid from official lenders at concessional terms as defined by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the OECD. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Loans from major regional development banks--African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank--and from the World Bank are classified as concessional according to each institution's classification and not according to the DAC definition, as was the practice in earlier reports. LDOD is the total outstanding long-term debt at year end. Long-term external debt is defined as debt that has an original or extended maturity of more than one year and that is owed to nonresidents and repayable in currency, goods, or services.  The denominator is the sum of total goods and service exports (per the balance of payments account) and workers' remittances (per the balance of payments account).