Malawi vs Uganda: Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio

Malawi
54.7%
in 2011
Uganda
57.3%
in 2011
Malawi rank
22nd
Uganda rank
19th

Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio over time

  • Malawi
  • Uganda
0100200300400500200520082011

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 57.3% against 54.7% in Malawi, a difference of 2.6%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 22nd and Uganda ranks 19th of 36 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 152.7% 77.5% 75.2% Malawi
2010s 55.5% 58.3% 2.7% Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt on concessional terms to export ratio, Malawi or Uganda?
Uganda, at 57.3% against 54.7% in Malawi as of 2011.
What is the difference in debt on concessional terms to export ratio between Malawi and Uganda?
2.6%, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uganda?
7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
How do Malawi and Uganda rank globally for debt on concessional terms to export ratio?
Malawi ranks 22nd and Uganda ranks 19th of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio (% of exports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Uganda: Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-on-concessional-terms-to-export-ratio-percent-of-exports/malawi/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-on-concessional-terms-to-export-ratio-percent-of-exports/malawi/uganda/">Malawi vs Uganda: Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio (% of exports)
Unit
% of exports
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
42 places, 283 data points, 2005–2011
Last refreshed

Concessional Long-term Debt Outstanding and Disbursed (LDOD) conveys information about the borrower's receipt of aid from official lenders at concessional terms as defined by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the OECD. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Loans from major regional development banks--African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank--and from the World Bank are classified as concessional according to each institution's classification and not according to the DAC definition, as was the practice in earlier reports. LDOD is the total outstanding long-term debt at year end. Long-term external debt is defined as debt that has an original or extended maturity of more than one year and that is owed to nonresidents and repayable in currency, goods, or services.  The denominator is the sum of total goods and service exports (per the balance of payments account) and workers' remittances (per the balance of payments account).