Rwanda vs Sierra Leone: Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio

Rwanda
89.6%
in 2011
Sierra Leone
87.9%
in 2011
Rwanda rank
8th
Sierra Leone rank
9th

Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sierra Leone
100200300400500200520082011

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 89.6% against 87.9% in Sierra Leone, a difference of 1.7%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 8th and Sierra Leone ranks 9th of 36 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
2000s 191.7% 210.6% 18.9% Sierra Leone
2010s 97.6% 91.5% 6.1% Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt on concessional terms to export ratio, Rwanda or Sierra Leone?
Rwanda, at 89.6% against 87.9% in Sierra Leone as of 2011.
What is the difference in debt on concessional terms to export ratio between Rwanda and Sierra Leone?
1.7%, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sierra Leone?
7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
How do Rwanda and Sierra Leone rank globally for debt on concessional terms to export ratio?
Rwanda ranks 8th and Sierra Leone ranks 9th of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio (% of exports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sierra Leone: Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-on-concessional-terms-to-export-ratio-percent-of-exports/rwanda/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-on-concessional-terms-to-export-ratio-percent-of-exports/rwanda/sierra-leone/">Rwanda vs Sierra Leone: Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt on Concessional terms to export ratio (% of exports)
Unit
% of exports
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
42 places, 283 data points, 2005–2011
Last refreshed

Concessional Long-term Debt Outstanding and Disbursed (LDOD) conveys information about the borrower's receipt of aid from official lenders at concessional terms as defined by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the OECD. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Loans from major regional development banks--African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank--and from the World Bank are classified as concessional according to each institution's classification and not according to the DAC definition, as was the practice in earlier reports. LDOD is the total outstanding long-term debt at year end. Long-term external debt is defined as debt that has an original or extended maturity of more than one year and that is owed to nonresidents and repayable in currency, goods, or services.  The denominator is the sum of total goods and service exports (per the balance of payments account) and workers' remittances (per the balance of payments account).