Cape Verde vs Eritrea: Debt on Concessional terms to GDP

Cape Verde
44.2%
in 2011
Eritrea
34.4%
in 2011
Cape Verde rank
6th
Eritrea rank
9th

Debt on Concessional terms to GDP over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Eritrea
0204060198119962011

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 44.2% against 34.4% in Eritrea, a difference of 9.8%.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.3 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 6th and Eritrea ranks 9th of 50 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 34.5% 13.6% 21.0% Cape Verde
2000s 45.9% 58.9% 13.0% Eritrea
2010s 44.4% 38.0% 6.4% Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt on concessional terms to gdp, Cape Verde or Eritrea?
Cape Verde, at 44.2% against 34.4% in Eritrea as of 2011.
What is the difference in debt on concessional terms to gdp between Cape Verde and Eritrea?
9.8%, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Eritrea?
18 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2011.
How do Cape Verde and Eritrea rank globally for debt on concessional terms to gdp?
Cape Verde ranks 6th and Eritrea ranks 9th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Debt on Concessional terms to GDP (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Eritrea: Debt on Concessional terms to GDP. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-on-concessional-terms-to-gdp-percent-of-gdp/cabo-verde/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-on-concessional-terms-to-gdp-percent-of-gdp/cabo-verde/eritrea/">Cape Verde vs Eritrea: Debt on Concessional terms to GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt on Concessional terms to GDP (% of GDP)
Unit
% of GDP
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
56 places, 2,120 data points, 1970–2011
Last refreshed

Concessional Long-term Debt Outstanding and Disbursed (LDOD) conveys information about the borrower's receipt of aid from official lenders at concessional terms as defined by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the OECD. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Loans from major regional development banks--African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank--and from the World Bank are classified as concessional according to each institution's classification and not according to the DAC definition, as was the practice in earlier reports. LDOD is the total outstanding long-term debt at year end. Long-term external debt is defined as debt that has an original or extended maturity of more than one year and that is owed to nonresidents and repayable in currency, goods, or services.