Cape Verde vs Eritrea: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Cape Verde
9.67 million DOD, current US$
in 2006
Eritrea
9.66 million DOD, current US$
in 2006
Cape Verde rank
35th
Eritrea rank
36th

Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Eritrea
010.0M20.0M30.0M197019882006

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 9.67 million DOD, current US$ against 9.66 million DOD, current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 4,000 DOD, current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eritrea ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 35th and Eritrea ranks 36th of 51 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Eritrea Difference Ahead
1970s 0 DOD, current US$ 0 DOD, current US$ 0 DOD, current US$
1980s 13.34 million DOD, current US$ 0 DOD, current US$ 13.34 million DOD, current US$ Cape Verde
1990s 14.31 million DOD, current US$ 1.17 million DOD, current US$ 13.14 million DOD, current US$ Cape Verde
2000s 14.09 million DOD, current US$ 9.66 million DOD, current US$ 4.43 million DOD, current US$ Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Cape Verde or Eritrea?
Cape Verde, at 9.67 million DOD, current US$ against 9.66 million DOD, current US$ in Eritrea as of 2006.
What is the difference in debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Cape Verde and Eritrea?
4,000 DOD, current US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Eritrea?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Cape Verde and Eritrea rank globally for debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Cape Verde ranks 35th and Eritrea ranks 36th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Eritrea: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-outstanding-and-disbursed-ppg-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dod-current-us/cabo-verde/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-outstanding-and-disbursed-ppg-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dod-current-us/cabo-verde/eritrea/">Cape Verde vs Eritrea: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. These are non-concessional figures, however the explanation for concessional is provided here as reference.  Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Principal repayments are actual amounts of principal (amortization) paid in currency, goods, or services in the year specified.