Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Eswatini
14.95 million DOD, current US$
in 2006
Sao Tome and Principe
15.75 million DOD, current US$
in 2006
Eswatini rank
32nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
31st

Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sao Tome and Principe
010.0M20.0M30.0M197019882006

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 15.75 million DOD, current US$ against 14.95 million DOD, current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 804,000 DOD, current US$.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 32nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 5.84 million DOD, current US$ 256,700 DOD, current US$ 5.58 million DOD, current US$ Eswatini
1980s 22.53 million DOD, current US$ 14.38 million DOD, current US$ 8.15 million DOD, current US$ Eswatini
1990s 6.95 million DOD, current US$ 13.19 million DOD, current US$ 6.24 million DOD, current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 17.09 million DOD, current US$ 10.17 million DOD, current US$ 6.93 million DOD, current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Eswatini or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 15.75 million DOD, current US$ against 14.95 million DOD, current US$ in Eswatini as of 2006.
What is the difference in debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
804,000 DOD, current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Eswatini ranks 32nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-outstanding-and-disbursed-ppg-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dod-current-us/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-outstanding-and-disbursed-ppg-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dod-current-us/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/">Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. These are non-concessional figures, however the explanation for concessional is provided here as reference.  Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Principal repayments are actual amounts of principal (amortization) paid in currency, goods, or services in the year specified.