Libya vs Malawi: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Libya
0 DOD, current US$
in 2006
Malawi
0 DOD, current US$
in 2006
Libya rank
45th
Malawi rank
45th

Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Libya
  • Malawi
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M197019882006

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0 DOD, current US$ against 0 DOD, current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 0 DOD, current US$.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 45th and Malawi ranks 45th of 51 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 0 DOD, current US$ 42.49 million DOD, current US$ 42.49 million DOD, current US$ Malawi
1980s 0 DOD, current US$ 93.26 million DOD, current US$ 93.26 million DOD, current US$ Malawi
1990s 0 DOD, current US$ 29.10 million DOD, current US$ 29.10 million DOD, current US$ Malawi
2000s 0 DOD, current US$ 9.46 million DOD, current US$ 9.46 million DOD, current US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Libya or Malawi?
Libya, at 0 DOD, current US$ against 0 DOD, current US$ in Malawi as of 2006.
What is the difference in debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Libya and Malawi?
0 DOD, current US$, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Malawi?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Libya and Malawi rank globally for debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Libya ranks 45th and Malawi ranks 45th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Malawi: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-outstanding-and-disbursed-ppg-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dod-current-us/libya/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-outstanding-and-disbursed-ppg-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dod-current-us/libya/malawi/">Libya vs Malawi: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. These are non-concessional figures, however the explanation for concessional is provided here as reference.  Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Principal repayments are actual amounts of principal (amortization) paid in currency, goods, or services in the year specified.