Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Mauritius
18.68 million DOD, current US$
in 2006
Sao Tome and Principe
15.75 million DOD, current US$
in 2006
Mauritius rank
30th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
31st

Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M197019882006

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 18.68 million DOD, current US$ against 15.75 million DOD, current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 2.93 million DOD, current US$.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 30th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 51 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 14.67 million DOD, current US$ 256,700 DOD, current US$ 14.41 million DOD, current US$ Mauritius
1980s 33.31 million DOD, current US$ 14.38 million DOD, current US$ 18.92 million DOD, current US$ Mauritius
1990s 31.72 million DOD, current US$ 13.19 million DOD, current US$ 18.53 million DOD, current US$ Mauritius
2000s 50.36 million DOD, current US$ 10.17 million DOD, current US$ 40.19 million DOD, current US$ Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
Mauritius, at 18.68 million DOD, current US$ against 15.75 million DOD, current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2006.
What is the difference in debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
2.93 million DOD, current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Mauritius ranks 30th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-outstanding-and-disbursed-ppg-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dod-current-us/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-outstanding-and-disbursed-ppg-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dod-current-us/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. These are non-concessional figures, however the explanation for concessional is provided here as reference.  Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Principal repayments are actual amounts of principal (amortization) paid in currency, goods, or services in the year specified.