Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Tunisia
319.04 million DOD, current US$
in 2006
Zimbabwe
313.02 million DOD, current US$
in 2006
Tunisia rank
10th
Zimbabwe rank
11th

Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Tunisia
  • Zimbabwe
0500.0M1.0B1.5B197019882006

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 319.04 million DOD, current US$ against 313.02 million DOD, current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6.02 million DOD, current US$.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Tunisia ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 51 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 71.25 million DOD, current US$ 0 DOD, current US$ 71.25 million DOD, current US$ Tunisia
1980s 348.74 million DOD, current US$ 97.30 million DOD, current US$ 251.44 million DOD, current US$ Tunisia
1990s 845.30 million DOD, current US$ 155.55 million DOD, current US$ 689.75 million DOD, current US$ Tunisia
2000s 438.28 million DOD, current US$ 270.76 million DOD, current US$ 167.52 million DOD, current US$ Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Tunisia or Zimbabwe?
Tunisia, at 319.04 million DOD, current US$ against 313.02 million DOD, current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2006.
What is the difference in debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
6.02 million DOD, current US$, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for debt outstanding and disbursed, ppg bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Tunisia ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DOD, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-outstanding-and-disbursed-ppg-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dod-current-us/tunisia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-outstanding-and-disbursed-ppg-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dod-current-us/tunisia/zimbabwe/">Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt outstanding and disbursed, PPG Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DOD, current US$)
Unit
DOD, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. These are non-concessional figures, however the explanation for concessional is provided here as reference.  Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Principal repayments are actual amounts of principal (amortization) paid in currency, goods, or services in the year specified.