Egypt vs Pakistan: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square

Egypt
21,500 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
20,872 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
42nd
Pakistan rank
43rd

Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square over time

  • Egypt
  • Pakistan
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019962023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 21,500 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 20,872 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 628 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Pakistan ahead.

Egypt ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 43rd of 120 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 379.17 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 445.79 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 66.62 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 2,170 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,793 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 376.52 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 2,375 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,611 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,236 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 2,481 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,916 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,434 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 5,449 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7,363 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,914 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 17,633 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 18,171 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 538.65 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square, Egypt or Pakistan?
Egypt, at 21,500 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 20,872 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square between Egypt and Pakistan?
628 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Pakistan rank globally for debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square?
Egypt ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 43rd of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Pakistan: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-service-on-external-debt-total-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-service-on-external-debt-total-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/pakistan/">Egypt vs Pakistan: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
132 places, 6,172 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.