Eswatini vs Nigeria: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square

Eswatini
10,515 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
10,597 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
60th
Nigeria rank
59th

Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Nigeria
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019962023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 10,597 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 10,515 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 82 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 60th and Nigeria ranks 59th of 120 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Nigeria Difference Ahead
1970s 307.31 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 225.62 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 81.69 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 1,667 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,589 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 922.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 1,595 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,189 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 594.73 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 2,396 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,203 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 807.23 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 5,133 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,222 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,911 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 6,313 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8,672 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,358 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square, Eswatini or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 10,597 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 10,515 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square between Eswatini and Nigeria?
82 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nigeria?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Nigeria rank globally for debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 60th and Nigeria ranks 59th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Nigeria: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-service-on-external-debt-total-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-service-on-external-debt-total-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nigeria/">Eswatini vs Nigeria: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
132 places, 6,172 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.