Guatemala vs Rwanda: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square

Guatemala
23,931 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
22,107 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
39th
Rwanda rank
41st

Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Rwanda
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 23,931 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 22,107 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 1,824 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 39th and Rwanda ranks 41st of 120 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 536.68 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 82.3 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 454.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 2,557 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 642.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,915 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 3,401 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 830.59 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,570 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 9,191 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,179 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8,012 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 21,213 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 6,899 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 14,314 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 27,707 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 18,221 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9,486 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square, Guatemala or Rwanda?
Guatemala, at 23,931 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 22,107 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square between Guatemala and Rwanda?
1,824 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Rwanda rank globally for debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square?
Guatemala ranks 39th and Rwanda ranks 41st of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Rwanda: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-service-on-external-debt-total-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-service-on-external-debt-total-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/rwanda/">Guatemala vs Rwanda: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
132 places, 6,172 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.