Pakistan vs Rwanda: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square

Pakistan
20,872 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
22,107 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
43rd
Rwanda rank
41st

Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square over time

  • Pakistan
  • Rwanda
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 22,107 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 20,872 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 1,235 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 43rd and Rwanda ranks 41st of 120 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 445.79 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 82.3 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 363.49 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 1,793 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 642.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,151 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 3,611 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 830.59 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,780 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 3,916 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,179 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,736 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 7,363 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 6,899 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 463.59 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 18,171 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 18,221 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 49.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square, Pakistan or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 22,107 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 20,872 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square between Pakistan and Rwanda?
1,235 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Rwanda rank globally for debt service on external debt, total (tds, current us$), per square?
Pakistan ranks 43rd and Rwanda ranks 41st of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Rwanda: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-service-on-external-debt-total-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/debt-service-on-external-debt-total-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/rwanda/">Pakistan vs Rwanda: Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
132 places, 6,172 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.