Australia vs Hong Kong, China: Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net)

Australia
-39.19 billion
in 2024
Hong Kong, China
-38.93 billion
in 2024
Australia rank
192nd
Hong Kong, China rank
191st

Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net) over time

  • Australia
  • Hong Kong, China
-100.0B-50.0B050.0B200520142024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports -38.93 billion against -39.19 billion in Australia, a difference of 265.70 million.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Australia ranks 192nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 191st of 195 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s -14.97 billion -976.65 million 14.00 billion Hong Kong, China
2010s -43.49 billion -18.05 billion 25.44 billion Hong Kong, China
2020s -7.07 billion -29.18 billion 22.11 billion Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher direct investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less net), Australia or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at -38.93 billion against -39.19 billion in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in direct investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less net) between Australia and Hong Kong, China?
265.70 million, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Hong Kong, China?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Australia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for direct investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less net)?
Australia ranks 192nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 191st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net incurrence of liabilities) (US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Hong Kong, China: Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/direct-investment-net-net-acquisition-of-financial-assets-less-net-incurrence-of/australia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/direct-investment-net-net-acquisition-of-financial-assets-less-net-incurrence-of/australia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Australia vs Hong Kong, China: Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net incurrence of liabilities) (US dollar)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
204 places, 3,835 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The World and Country Group Aggregates (historically called BOPSY) is an annual publication, released each November, of major balance of payments and international investment position components for countries, country groups, and the world.