Middle East and Central Asia vs United Kingdom: Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net)

Middle East and Central Asia
-24.65 billion
in 2024
United Kingdom
64.80 billion
in 2024
Middle East and Central Asia rank
5th
United Kingdom rank
3rd

Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net) over time

  • Middle East and Central Asia
  • United Kingdom
-300.0B-200.0B-100.0B0100.0B200.0B200520142024

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 64.80 billion against -24.65 billion in Middle East and Central Asia, a difference of 89.45 billion.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 2.6 times Middle East and Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Middle East and Central Asia ahead.

Middle East and Central Asia ranks 5th and United Kingdom ranks 3rd of 9 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Middle East and Central Asia averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle East and Central Asia United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s -38.96 billion 9.41 billion 48.37 billion United Kingdom
2010s -16.41 billion -56.99 billion 40.57 billion Middle East and Central Asia
2020s -23.90 billion 35.22 billion 59.13 billion United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher direct investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less net), Middle East and Central Asia or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 64.80 billion against -24.65 billion in Middle East and Central Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in direct investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less net) between Middle East and Central Asia and United Kingdom?
89.45 billion, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East and Central Asia and United Kingdom?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Middle East and Central Asia and United Kingdom rank globally for direct investment, net (net acquisition of financial assets less net)?
Middle East and Central Asia ranks 5th and United Kingdom ranks 3rd of 9 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net incurrence of liabilities) (US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East and Central Asia vs United Kingdom: Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/direct-investment-net-net-acquisition-of-financial-assets-less-net-incurrence-of/middle-east-and-central-asia/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/direct-investment-net-net-acquisition-of-financial-assets-less-net-incurrence-of/middle-east-and-central-asia/united-kingdom/">Middle East and Central Asia vs United Kingdom: Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Direct investment, Net (net acquisition of financial assets less net incurrence of liabilities) (US dollar)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
204 places, 3,835 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The World and Country Group Aggregates (historically called BOPSY) is an annual publication, released each November, of major balance of payments and international investment position components for countries, country groups, and the world.