Algeria vs Lesotho: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time
- Algeria
- Lesotho
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Lesotho, a difference of 0 DIS, current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Lesotho ahead.
Algeria ranks 14th and Lesotho ranks 14th of 51 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 182.40 million DIS, current US$ | 122,100 DIS, current US$ | 182.28 million DIS, current US$ | Algeria |
| 1980s | 430.06 million DIS, current US$ | 3.80 million DIS, current US$ | 426.26 million DIS, current US$ | Algeria |
| 1990s | 404.72 million DIS, current US$ | 7.65 million DIS, current US$ | 397.07 million DIS, current US$ | Algeria |
| 2000s | 56.61 million DIS, current US$ | 4.47 million DIS, current US$ | 52.14 million DIS, current US$ | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Algeria or Lesotho?
- Algeria, at 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Lesotho as of 2006.
- What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Algeria and Lesotho?
- 0 DIS, current US$, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Lesotho?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
- How do Algeria and Lesotho rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
- Algeria ranks 14th and Lesotho ranks 14th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.