Cabo Verde vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Cabo Verde
0 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
0 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Cabo Verde rank
14th
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
14th

Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M197019882006

How they compare

Cabo Verde currently reports 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, a difference of 0 DIS, current US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.

Cabo Verde ranks 14th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 14th of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 0 DIS, current US$ 51,700 DIS, current US$ 51,700 DIS, current US$ Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
1980s 2.77 million DIS, current US$ 2.62 million DIS, current US$ 147,800 DIS, current US$ Cabo Verde
1990s 3.44 million DIS, current US$ 0 DIS, current US$ 3.44 million DIS, current US$ Cabo Verde
2000s 0 DIS, current US$ 0 DIS, current US$ 0 DIS, current US$

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Cabo Verde or Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
Cabo Verde, at 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of as of 2006.
What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
0 DIS, current US$, with Cabo Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Cabo Verde ranks 14th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 14th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/">Cabo Verde vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$)
Unit
DIS, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.