Chad vs Mozambique: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Chad
0 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Mozambique
65,000 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Chad rank
14th
Mozambique rank
11th

Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Chad
  • Mozambique
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M197019882006

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 65,000 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Chad, a difference of 65,000 DIS, current US$.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 14th and Mozambique ranks 11th of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mozambique Difference Ahead
1970s 3.95 million DIS, current US$ 0 DIS, current US$ 3.95 million DIS, current US$ Chad
1980s 823,200 DIS, current US$ 6.07 million DIS, current US$ 5.25 million DIS, current US$ Mozambique
1990s 715,400 DIS, current US$ 98,000 DIS, current US$ 617,400 DIS, current US$ Chad
2000s 8,857 DIS, current US$ 1.80 million DIS, current US$ 1.79 million DIS, current US$ Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Chad or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 65,000 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Chad as of 2006.
What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Chad and Mozambique?
65,000 DIS, current US$, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mozambique?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Chad and Mozambique rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Chad ranks 14th and Mozambique ranks 11th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mozambique: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/chad/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/chad/mozambique/">Chad vs Mozambique: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$)
Unit
DIS, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.