Congo vs Egypt: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Congo
0 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Egypt
0 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Congo rank
14th
Egypt rank
14th

Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Congo
  • Egypt
0500.0M1.0B1.5B197019882006

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Egypt, a difference of 0 DIS, current US$.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 14th and Egypt ranks 14th of 51 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Egypt Difference Ahead
1970s 10.41 million DIS, current US$ 169.55 million DIS, current US$ 159.14 million DIS, current US$ Egypt
1980s 12.91 million DIS, current US$ 728.10 million DIS, current US$ 715.19 million DIS, current US$ Egypt
1990s 269,000 DIS, current US$ 54.44 million DIS, current US$ 54.17 million DIS, current US$ Egypt
2000s 0 DIS, current US$ 4.17 million DIS, current US$ 4.17 million DIS, current US$ Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Congo or Egypt?
Congo, at 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Egypt as of 2006.
What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Congo and Egypt?
0 DIS, current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Egypt?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Congo and Egypt rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Congo ranks 14th and Egypt ranks 14th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Egypt: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/congo-rep/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/congo-rep/egypt-arab-rep/">Congo vs Egypt: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$)
Unit
DIS, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.