Egypt vs Lesotho: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Egypt
0 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Lesotho
0 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Egypt rank
14th
Lesotho rank
14th

Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Egypt
  • Lesotho
0500.0M1.0B1.5B197019882006

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Lesotho, a difference of 0 DIS, current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 14th and Lesotho ranks 14th of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Lesotho in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Lesotho Difference Ahead
1970s 169.55 million DIS, current US$ 122,100 DIS, current US$ 169.43 million DIS, current US$ Egypt
1980s 728.10 million DIS, current US$ 3.80 million DIS, current US$ 724.30 million DIS, current US$ Egypt
1990s 54.44 million DIS, current US$ 7.65 million DIS, current US$ 46.80 million DIS, current US$ Egypt
2000s 4.17 million DIS, current US$ 4.47 million DIS, current US$ 306,000 DIS, current US$ Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Egypt or Lesotho?
Egypt, at 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Lesotho as of 2006.
What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Egypt and Lesotho?
0 DIS, current US$, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Lesotho?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Egypt and Lesotho rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Egypt ranks 14th and Lesotho ranks 14th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Lesotho: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/egypt-arab-rep/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/egypt-arab-rep/lesotho/">Egypt vs Lesotho: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$)
Unit
DIS, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.