Ethiopia vs Mauritius: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Ethiopia
0 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Mauritius
0 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Ethiopia rank
14th
Mauritius rank
14th

Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Mauritius
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M197019882006

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 0 DIS, current US$.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritius ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 14th and Mauritius ranks 14th of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 1.40 million DIS, current US$ 2.86 million DIS, current US$ 1.46 million DIS, current US$ Mauritius
1980s 32.32 million DIS, current US$ 6.08 million DIS, current US$ 26.24 million DIS, current US$ Ethiopia
1990s 6.30 million DIS, current US$ 6.27 million DIS, current US$ 30,800 DIS, current US$ Ethiopia
2000s 0 DIS, current US$ 3.58 million DIS, current US$ 3.58 million DIS, current US$ Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Ethiopia or Mauritius?
Ethiopia, at 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Mauritius as of 2006.
What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Ethiopia and Mauritius?
0 DIS, current US$, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Mauritius?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Ethiopia and Mauritius rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Ethiopia ranks 14th and Mauritius ranks 14th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Mauritius: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/ethiopia/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/ethiopia/mauritius/">Ethiopia vs Mauritius: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$)
Unit
DIS, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.