Guinea-Bissau vs Kenya: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Guinea-Bissau
0 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Kenya
0 DIS, current US$
in 2006
Guinea-Bissau rank
14th
Kenya rank
14th

Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Kenya
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M197019882006

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Kenya, a difference of 0 DIS, current US$.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 14th and Kenya ranks 14th of 51 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Kenya Difference Ahead
1970s 869,800 DIS, current US$ 16.81 million DIS, current US$ 15.94 million DIS, current US$ Kenya
1980s 2.52 million DIS, current US$ 39.36 million DIS, current US$ 36.85 million DIS, current US$ Kenya
1990s 1.36 million DIS, current US$ 21.16 million DIS, current US$ 19.80 million DIS, current US$ Kenya
2000s 0 DIS, current US$ 3.88 million DIS, current US$ 3.88 million DIS, current US$ Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Guinea-Bissau or Kenya?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 DIS, current US$ against 0 DIS, current US$ in Kenya as of 2006.
What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Guinea-Bissau and Kenya?
0 DIS, current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Kenya?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Kenya rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 14th and Kenya ranks 14th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Kenya: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/guinea-bissau/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/guinea-bissau/kenya/">Guinea-Bissau vs Kenya: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$)
Unit
DIS, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.