Madagascar vs Sudan: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Madagascar
18.88 million DIS, current US$
in 2006
Sudan
20.94 million DIS, current US$
in 2006
Madagascar rank
6th
Sudan rank
4th

Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Madagascar
  • Sudan
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M197019882006

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 20.94 million DIS, current US$ against 18.88 million DIS, current US$ in Madagascar, a difference of 2.06 million DIS, current US$.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sudan ahead.

Madagascar ranks 6th and Sudan ranks 4th of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Sudan Difference Ahead
1970s 2.06 million DIS, current US$ 59.74 million DIS, current US$ 57.68 million DIS, current US$ Sudan
1980s 58.57 million DIS, current US$ 73.05 million DIS, current US$ 14.48 million DIS, current US$ Sudan
1990s 11.46 million DIS, current US$ 0 DIS, current US$ 11.46 million DIS, current US$ Madagascar
2000s 3.11 million DIS, current US$ 50.37 million DIS, current US$ 47.26 million DIS, current US$ Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Madagascar or Sudan?
Sudan, at 20.94 million DIS, current US$ against 18.88 million DIS, current US$ in Madagascar as of 2006.
What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Madagascar and Sudan?
2.06 million DIS, current US$, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Sudan?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Madagascar and Sudan rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Madagascar ranks 6th and Sudan ranks 4th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Sudan: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/madagascar/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/madagascar/sudan/">Madagascar vs Sudan: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$)
Unit
DIS, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.