North Africa vs Zimbabwe: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

North Africa
81.84 million DIS, current US$
in 2006
Zimbabwe
20.27 million DIS, current US$
in 2006
North Africa rank
6th
Zimbabwe rank
5th

Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • North Africa
  • Zimbabwe
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B197019882006

How they compare

North Africa currently reports 81.84 million DIS, current US$ against 20.27 million DIS, current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 61.57 million DIS, current US$.

That makes North Africa's figure about 4.0 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 37 years both countries report, North Africa has been ahead every year.

North Africa ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 6 groups.

North Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 394.53 million DIS, current US$ 0 DIS, current US$ 394.53 million DIS, current US$ North Africa
1980s 1.33 billion DIS, current US$ 21.56 million DIS, current US$ 1.31 billion DIS, current US$ North Africa
1990s 651.02 million DIS, current US$ 29.46 million DIS, current US$ 621.56 million DIS, current US$ North Africa
2000s 147.86 million DIS, current US$ 22.29 million DIS, current US$ 125.56 million DIS, current US$ North Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, North Africa or Zimbabwe?
North Africa, at 81.84 million DIS, current US$ against 20.27 million DIS, current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2006.
What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between North Africa and Zimbabwe?
61.57 million DIS, current US$, with North Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Africa and Zimbabwe?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do North Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
North Africa ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 6 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Africa vs Zimbabwe: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/north-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/north-africa/zimbabwe/">North Africa vs Zimbabwe: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$)
Unit
DIS, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.