Senegal vs Zimbabwe: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Senegal
5.00 million DIS, current US$
in 2006
Zimbabwe
20.27 million DIS, current US$
in 2006
Senegal rank
7th
Zimbabwe rank
5th

Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Senegal
  • Zimbabwe
050.0M100.0M150.0M197019882006

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 20.27 million DIS, current US$ against 5.00 million DIS, current US$ in Senegal, a difference of 15.27 million DIS, current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 4.1 times Senegal's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Senegal ahead.

Senegal ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Senegal averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Senegal Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 9.63 million DIS, current US$ 0 DIS, current US$ 9.63 million DIS, current US$ Senegal
1980s 43.69 million DIS, current US$ 21.56 million DIS, current US$ 22.13 million DIS, current US$ Senegal
1990s 7.78 million DIS, current US$ 29.46 million DIS, current US$ 21.67 million DIS, current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 2.62 million DIS, current US$ 22.29 million DIS, current US$ 19.67 million DIS, current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Senegal or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 20.27 million DIS, current US$ against 5.00 million DIS, current US$ in Senegal as of 2006.
What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Senegal and Zimbabwe?
15.27 million DIS, current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Zimbabwe?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Senegal and Zimbabwe rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Senegal ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Senegal vs Zimbabwe: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/senegal/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/senegal/zimbabwe/">Senegal vs Zimbabwe: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$)
Unit
DIS, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.