Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tunisia: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Sub-Saharan Africa
204.57 million DIS, current US$
in 2006
Tunisia
30.22 million DIS, current US$
in 2006
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
2nd
Tunisia rank
3rd

Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Tunisia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B197019882006

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 204.57 million DIS, current US$ against 30.22 million DIS, current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 174.35 million DIS, current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 6.8 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd and Tunisia ranks 3rd of 6 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 312.84 million DIS, current US$ 22.06 million DIS, current US$ 290.78 million DIS, current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 787.29 million DIS, current US$ 64.57 million DIS, current US$ 722.72 million DIS, current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 238.58 million DIS, current US$ 81.78 million DIS, current US$ 156.80 million DIS, current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 256.41 million DIS, current US$ 48.74 million DIS, current US$ 207.67 million DIS, current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Sub-Saharan Africa or Tunisia?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 204.57 million DIS, current US$ against 30.22 million DIS, current US$ in Tunisia as of 2006.
What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Sub-Saharan Africa and Tunisia?
174.35 million DIS, current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tunisia?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Tunisia rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd and Tunisia ranks 3rd of 6 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tunisia: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/sub-saharan-africa/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/sub-saharan-africa/tunisia/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tunisia: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$)
Unit
DIS, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.