Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms

Sudan
20.94 million DIS, current US$
in 2006
Zimbabwe
20.27 million DIS, current US$
in 2006
Sudan rank
4th
Zimbabwe rank
5th

Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms over time

  • Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M197019882006

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 20.94 million DIS, current US$ against 20.27 million DIS, current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 675,000 DIS, current US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 59.74 million DIS, current US$ 0 DIS, current US$ 59.74 million DIS, current US$ Sudan
1980s 73.05 million DIS, current US$ 21.56 million DIS, current US$ 51.49 million DIS, current US$ Sudan
1990s 0 DIS, current US$ 29.46 million DIS, current US$ 29.46 million DIS, current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 50.37 million DIS, current US$ 22.29 million DIS, current US$ 28.07 million DIS, current US$ Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Sudan, at 20.94 million DIS, current US$ against 20.27 million DIS, current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2006.
What is the difference in disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
675,000 DIS, current US$, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2006.
How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for disbursements, bilateral on nonconcessional terms?
Sudan ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Global Development Finance, published as Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Global Development Finance. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/disbursements-bilateral-on-nonconcessional-terms-dis-current-us/sudan/zimbabwe/">Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disbursements, Bilateral on nonconcessional terms (DIS, current US$)
Unit
DIS, current US$
Source
World Bank, Global Development Finance
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,109 data points, 1970–2006
Last refreshed

Bilateral debt includes loans from governments and their agencies (including central banks), loans from autonomous bodies, and direct loans from official export credit agencies. Concessional debt is defined as loans with an original grant element of 25 percent or more. The grant equivalent of a loan is its commitment (present) value, less the discounted present value of its contractual debt service; conventionally, future service payments are discounted at 10 percent. The grant element of a loan is the grant equivalent expressed as a percentage of the amount committed. It is used as a measure of the overall cost of borrowing. Disbursements are drawings on loan commitments during the year specified.