Bangladesh vs Tunisia: External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square

Bangladesh
109,487 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
100,443 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
18th
Tunisia rank
20th

External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Tunisia
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019962023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 109,487 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 100,443 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 9,044 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Tunisia ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 18th and Tunisia ranks 20th of 120 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 207.82 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 834.57 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 626.75 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 1,078 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,341 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 262.99 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 1,456 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 7,110 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 5,653 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 7,420 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 21,592 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 14,172 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 45,240 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 44,945 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 295.19 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 118,775 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 86,010 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 32,766 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher external debt stocks, short-term (dod, current us$), per square, Bangladesh or Tunisia?
Bangladesh, at 109,487 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 100,443 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in external debt stocks, short-term (dod, current us$), per square between Bangladesh and Tunisia?
9,044 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Tunisia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Tunisia rank globally for external debt stocks, short-term (dod, current us$), per square?
Bangladesh ranks 18th and Tunisia ranks 20th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Tunisia: External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/external-debt-stocks-short-term-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/external-debt-stocks-short-term-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/tunisia/">Bangladesh vs Tunisia: External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
132 places, 6,001 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.