Pakistan vs Zimbabwe: External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square

Pakistan
11,598 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
10,175 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
50th
Zimbabwe rank
53rd

External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square over time

  • Pakistan
  • Zimbabwe
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k197019962023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 11,598 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 10,175 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,423 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 120 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 247.25 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 31.55 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 215.7 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 1,912 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 895.95 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,016 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 3,648 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,793 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,855 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 1,878 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 2,965 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,087 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 8,056 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 7,392 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 664.1 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 11,030 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 10,019 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,011 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher external debt stocks, short-term (dod, current us$), per square, Pakistan or Zimbabwe?
Pakistan, at 11,598 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 10,175 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in external debt stocks, short-term (dod, current us$), per square between Pakistan and Zimbabwe?
1,423 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for external debt stocks, short-term (dod, current us$), per square?
Pakistan ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Zimbabwe: External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/external-debt-stocks-short-term-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/external-debt-stocks-short-term-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/zimbabwe/">Pakistan vs Zimbabwe: External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
132 places, 6,001 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.