Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for general environment protection, DAC

Equatorial Guinea
299,960 current US$
in 2011
Sao Tome and Principe
357,775 current US$
in 2011
Equatorial Guinea rank
51st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
50th

Gross ODA aid disbursement for general environment protection, DAC over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k200220062011

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 357,775 current US$ against 299,960 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 57,815 current US$.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 51st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 50th of 53 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 168,945 current US$ 198,657 current US$ 29,712 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 320,460 current US$ 259,556 current US$ 60,904 current US$ Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross oda aid disbursement for general environment protection, dac, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 357,775 current US$ against 299,960 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
What is the difference in gross oda aid disbursement for general environment protection, dac between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
57,815 current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross oda aid disbursement for general environment protection, dac?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 51st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 50th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Gross ODA aid disbursement for general environment protection, DAC donors total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for general environment protection, DAC. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-general-environment-protection-dac-donors-total-current-us/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-general-environment-protection-dac-donors-total-current-us/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for general environment protection, DAC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross ODA aid disbursement for general environment protection, DAC donors total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 573 data points, 2002–2011
Last refreshed

This is described environmental policy and administrative management; biosphere protection; bio-diversity; site preservation; flood prevention/control; environmental education/training and environmental research. Data are in current U.S. dollars.