Burkina Faso vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC

Burkina Faso
853,734 current US$
in 2011
Sao Tome and Principe
738,031 current US$
in 2010
Burkina Faso rank
21st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
22nd

Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Sao Tome and Principe
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M200220062011

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 853,734 current US$ against 738,031 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 115,703 current US$.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 21st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 22nd of 36 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac, Burkina Faso or Sao Tome and Principe?
Burkina Faso, at 853,734 current US$ against 738,031 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2011.
What is the difference in gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac between Burkina Faso and Sao Tome and Principe?
115,703 current US$, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sao Tome and Principe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2006.
How do Burkina Faso and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac?
Burkina Faso ranks 21st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 22nd of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC donors total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-mineral-resources-and-mining-dac-donors-total-current-us/burkina-faso/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-mineral-resources-and-mining-dac-donors-total-current-us/burkina-faso/sao-tome-and-principe/">Burkina Faso vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC donors total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
42 places, 359 data points, 2002–2011
Last refreshed

This is described as mineral/mining policy and administrative management; mineral prospection and exploration; coal; oil and gas; ferrous metals; non-ferrous metals; precious metals/materials; industrial minerals; fertilizer minerals and offshore minerals. Data are in current U.S. dollars.