Cape Verde vs Zimbabwe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC

Cape Verde
139,043 current US$
in 2011
Zimbabwe
37,531 current US$
in 2011
Cape Verde rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
32nd

Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k200220062011

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 139,043 current US$ against 37,531 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 101,512 current US$.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 3.7 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 36 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 371,701 current US$ 107,890 current US$ 263,811 current US$ Cape Verde
2010s 139,043 current US$ 37,531 current US$ 101,512 current US$ Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac, Cape Verde or Zimbabwe?
Cape Verde, at 139,043 current US$ against 37,531 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
What is the difference in gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac between Cape Verde and Zimbabwe?
101,512 current US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Zimbabwe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Cape Verde and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac?
Cape Verde ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC donors total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Zimbabwe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-mineral-resources-and-mining-dac-donors-total-current-us/cabo-verde/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-mineral-resources-and-mining-dac-donors-total-current-us/cabo-verde/zimbabwe/">Cape Verde vs Zimbabwe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC donors total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
42 places, 359 data points, 2002–2011
Last refreshed

This is described as mineral/mining policy and administrative management; mineral prospection and exploration; coal; oil and gas; ferrous metals; non-ferrous metals; precious metals/materials; industrial minerals; fertilizer minerals and offshore minerals. Data are in current U.S. dollars.