Congo vs Namibia: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC

Congo
354,758 current US$
in 2011
Namibia
630,732 current US$
in 2011
Congo rank
25th
Namibia rank
23rd

Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC over time

  • Congo
  • Namibia
01.0M2.0M3.0M200220062011

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 630,732 current US$ against 354,758 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 275,974 current US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.8 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 25th and Namibia ranks 23rd of 36 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 846,442 current US$ 211,386 current US$ 635,056 current US$ Congo
2010s 806,729 current US$ 561,732 current US$ 244,996 current US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac, Congo or Namibia?
Namibia, at 630,732 current US$ against 354,758 current US$ in Congo as of 2011.
What is the difference in gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac between Congo and Namibia?
275,974 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac?
Congo ranks 25th and Namibia ranks 23rd of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC donors total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Namibia: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-mineral-resources-and-mining-dac-donors-total-current-us/congo-rep/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-mineral-resources-and-mining-dac-donors-total-current-us/congo-rep/namibia/">Congo vs Namibia: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC donors total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
42 places, 359 data points, 2002–2011
Last refreshed

This is described as mineral/mining policy and administrative management; mineral prospection and exploration; coal; oil and gas; ferrous metals; non-ferrous metals; precious metals/materials; industrial minerals; fertilizer minerals and offshore minerals. Data are in current U.S. dollars.